|
KEY NOTE ADRESS BY
LN SISULU MINISTER OF HOUSING AT THE
CEREMONY TO LAUNCH THE
OLIEVENHOUTBOSCH HOUSING PROJECT
20 February 2006
Master of Ceremonies
Invited guests
Father Smangaliso Mkhatswa,
Coucillors, Steve Boosen,
Comrades, friends
Ladies and Gentlemen:
In
April
2005 together with ABSA we signed a
memorandum of understanding for a
project that will deliver 5480 units
in accordance with the Comprehensive
Plan on Sustainable Human
Settlements. This
Olievenhoutbosch housing project is
the result of our attempts to
consummate the relationship we had
committed ourselves to. It is a
response to my request for pilot
projects from the banks.
I must add at this
that ABSA was the first of the banks
to respond. The first to respond,
the first to show commitment. It
took lead to sell the idea of this
site to us. We visited the site, and
on the very same day we struck a
deal. That, to me, is indicative of
ABSA’s enthusiasm for this
partnership.
I have noted with a
great deal of appreciation how both
the province and Tshwane were swept
up by the mood of the project.
In terms of the
agreement for this
public-private-partnership ABSA was
to make land available for the
development of the project and
develop the bonded houses whilst
Tshwane was to develop the low-cost
houses. As national government we
committed to do all that was
necessary to expedite the project
and to facilitate coordination
between the respective government
departments.
The
project therefore, in accordance
with the Plan, is to address
integrated development. It is to be
a mixed housing project. Its
implementation is to achieve 70
percent of black ownership and have
30 percent of female participation.
Also, it is to provide opportunities
for SMME participation in the areas
of supply, manufacturing,
contractors, sub-contractors, as
well as services of skilled and
unskilled labour
I am, as you can
expect, thrilled, by this
partnership. As I have indicated
there was no hesitancy on the part
of ABSA to be involved in it.
Our towns and cities
are, as a result of rapid
urbanization, growing at an alarming
pace. We know what prevented the
development of opportunities such as
we have now. We thus know what
precipitated the critical challenge
that we face today of having to deal
with a housing backlog of almost
three million.
Since 1,9 million of
our people currently live in shacks
we have made the vow to eradicate
informal settlements by 2014. We
made the undertaking informed by the
conviction that there is no issue
that is as more urgent and critical
to the masses of our people than
adequate shelter and housing.
Their
conditions of squalor do not enable
them to live a decent life and take
advantage of the myriad of
opportunities that are being opened
up by the sterling performance of
the economy. Thus, even though
democracy has extricate the whole of
society out of the depths of the
economic crisis that apartheid
precipitated before 1994, the masses
of our people are as yet to fully
benefit from the cusp of our present
economic success. Hence, the
commitment we have made to provide
adequate housing to all by 2014.
We, however,
understand that towards 2014, is a
rocky climb. For, already, some,
albeit sitting and watching on the
sidelines, make much of the fact of
unemployment that they say is the
obstacle towards providing adequate
housing. Yet, all that we as
government have intentions about is
to through the banks to house those
that are already employed and of
whom most are found in the ranks of
the civil service. A 2005 research
that has been conducted Finmark
Trust shows that in the category
that is our target for housing by
the banks are 3.87 million
households with a gross monthly
income of between R1 600 and R8 000.
This is the challenge
towards which we need to mobilise
housing and mortgage finance,
specifically.
We need to reverse
the situation where backyards and
informal settlements continue to
increase at much a faster rate (of
26 percent) than the rate of
increase of 11 percent (between 1996
and 2001) in population growth. In
addition, we collectively need to
ensure that housing development does
not continue to be on the periphery
of economically active towns and
cities. The Finmark Trust research
demonstrates that this manner of
development has come to place at a
huge disadvantage over 11 million
adults who do not live near centres
of retail economic activity.
We have also made the
point that both the demand for
housing and the housing market has
changed but, the benefits of a
buoyant higher end property market
have not been felt by the poor. The
sale of second hand houses is
currently highly profitable for the
well-off but, often constitutes a
loss for the poor, particularly
those with subsidised housing.
Refocusing the housing programme
upmarket from the current target
group, while it may make narrow
investment sense (more self-funded
housing stock and the inclusion of
‘bankable’ people), will probably
exacerbate this situation rather
than more equitably distributing
benefits. If wealth creation is to
be stimulated amongst the current
beneficiaries of the programme, then
the housing asset needs to have
functional value (a usable physical
asset to create social and human
capital) and an exchange value (an
ability to create financial
capital), and this depends on
investment in inner city, township
and informal settlements so that the
property market works for everyone.
Hence, significant public investment
and substantial private sector
collaboration are called for.
Since, moreover,
there is evidence of households
presently managing their finances
much better resulting in much
lessened bad debts there is thus
opportunities for increases in bank
loans for housing.
Government has
emphasised the importance of
public-private partnership. This is
in recognition of the fact the
private sector has to contribute to
the development we seek to achieve,
through especially availing
financing.
In today’s world we
know that banks in particular have
become far more efficient in what
they do than ever before. But from
that very fact is it is important to
realize that financial services are
not necessarily an end in
themselves. They cannot exist by
themselves without regard to issues
of common growth and development.
Hence, the appreciation I have about
the role being played by ABSA in
this project.
As concerned I am
about this I definitely sure that
you are all concerned. For together
we share a history and a destiny.
So, if I had been too simplistic in
my view I expect you to show me.
This is because I expect no
subservience from yourselves but a
robust and constructive discussion
that builds all of us.
There is need for
investments in our urban areas that
foster integration. I appeal to
yourselves to help unleash the
potential that each one of us has to
make that possible. I believe that
you can. And I believe that you have
the will to do so.
Once again, let me
thank and congratulate ABSA for
having come to the party to enable
us to launch Olievenhoutbosch.
I am
therefore very grateful to Dr. Steve
Booysen, ABSA’s Chief Executive
Officer, Sipho Mashinini, the
Managing Director for ABSA
Development Company. I am also
grateful to the Mayor of Tshwane
Father Smangaliso Mkhatshwa for
making sure that Tshwane delivers
its part.
I thank you very
much. |